(ChrisMosier FB Page/Tia Thompson/ Bloomberg / Contributor)

Do trans athletes have an unfair advantage in sports?

Tia Thompson has one dream: to represent the USA in volleyball at the 2020 Olympic Games in Tokyo. But she’ll need more than impressive spiking skills and an amazing tryout to make the squad.

She’ll need acceptance.

Assigned male at birth, the 32-year-old transgender woman from Hawaii says she started identifying with girls at a young age and began hormone therapy and testosterone suppression as soon as she moved out of her family’s home at 18.

Volleyball, one of Hawaii’s most popular sports, had always been a passion for Thompson, who has willingly played in men’s semipro leagues for most of her adult career. But three years ago, as her transition to a woman became more solidified as more people began to realize the plight of trans athletes, she says she began to feel strongly that she need to play for the gender with which she identified—not just for herself, but for trans athletes all over the world.

“I thought about the next generation coming up and the younger transgender people who want to participate in sports according to their gender,” Thompson told Excelle Sports. “I thought, ‘This is going to be a good thing. I’m going to do this.’”

So since 2014, the 5-foot-11 outside hitter has submitted paperwork every year to USA Volleyball’s (USAV) gender committee, arguing for the right for her to play in women’s tournaments. Finally, in January of this year, the committee gave Thompson permission to enter as a female in her first tournament, the Haili Volleyball Tournament, which took place in Hilo, Hawaii in March.

“I was so overwhelmed and happy,” Thompson said.

But not everyone was as pleased as Thompson and others in the trans athlete community with USAV’s decision. Instead, the ruling was largely met with apprehension from many athletes, spectators and coaches who felt that the hitter, despite hormone suppression, still has unfair advantages over biological women. Hawaii broadcast news station Hawaii News Now talked to players and parents who said USAV’s transgender policy “creates an unrealistic level of competition.”

The question of what’s fair in gender and sport

The controversy Thompson is facing is hardly unique. Though there is no conclusive data on the total number trans athletes who are competing on an elite level, there have been a number of transgender individuals who have qualified for international competitions. In 2016, two trans women qualified to compete in the Rio Olympics for Great Britain but did not, in part because they feared being “exposed and ridiculed.” In the same year, American duathlete Chris Mosier became the first trans man to compete at World Championships for Team USA.

While some Americans are supportive of a transgender person’s right to assume another gender identity, fewer are sympathetic to trans athletes, especially men who transition to women, arguing that they can pose an unfair advantage over congenital female athletes.

[More from Excelle Sports: Grand Slam icon Margaret Court: ‘Tennis is full of lesbians’]

In 2003, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) ruled that it was fair for transgender athletes to compete in the Olympics, providing that they underwent hormone replacement therapy for at least two years prior to competition, had genital reconstruction surgery to reflect the gender with which they identified and changed their gender identity on all legal documents.

In November 2015, less than a year before the Rio Olympics, the IOC changed its requirement in an attempt to make the 2016 Games more inclusive after determining that trans women do not pose an unfair advantage in sports as long as their testosterone levels are consistent with those of athletes who were designated female at birth. The IOC also ruled that sex reassignment surgery was unnecessary, as it made little to no impact on an athlete’s performance.

Testosterone, a man’s primary sex hormone that’s found in women in lower levels, increases muscle mass, strength and bone density. That’s why athletes with more “T” in their bodies tend to have a competitive edge over their opponents.

Under the IOC’s current policy, trans men—women who have transitioned to be men—don’t have to undergo hormone therapy to compete as male athletes; their testosterone levels, which would give them an athletic advantage, are naturally low. For trans women, however, or men who have transitioned to be women, the IOC scaled back on the length of hormone treatments. Trans women must undergo at least one year of testosterone suppression, or hormone deprivation therapy, to enter female divisions. Then, 12 months before even attempting to qualify for an Olympic team, an athlete’s testosterone levels must be below 10 nmol/L.

While the IOC’s policy seems straightforward, some experts say it doesn’t prevent the performance bias for trans women athletes.

[More from Excelle Sports: Trans athlete Chris Mosier speaks out against North Carolina bathroom bill]

Dr. Ramona Krutzik, an endocrinologist with the Imperial Valley Endocrine Medical Corporation in Brawley, CA who has 19 years of experience studying human hormones, believes that one year of hormone therapy is not enough to reverse the “advantageous” effects that trans women athletes have after male puberty.

According to Krutzik, athletes who grow up as men have already enjoyed an increased ability to build muscle and bone mass for years, which accounts for endurance and strength differences between biological men and women. And a few years of hormone suppression does not reverse these effects.

“Typically, you’re looking at about 15 years after [hormone] suppression and [sex reassignment surgery] to really start to see significant changes in bone density,” Krutzik told boxing magazine Bloody Elbow.

Other physicians, however, say that trans women athletes have less of an edge than most people think. Trans woman Joanna Harper, a medical physicist at Providence Portland Medical Center in Oregon who advised the IOC on its latest transgender policies, published a study in 2015 that found that hormone therapy actually makes male-to-female road runners slower.

An avid amateur road racer herself, Harper discovered that she became 12 percent slower in Masters running events after just one year of testosterone suppression.

Masters runner Joanna Harper  (Tom Hauck/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Harper also studied seven other male-to-female distance runners who had the same experience. While these athletes were able keep their height and bone mass during the beginning of their transitions, all seven lost muscle mass and eventually had lower levels of testosterone than biological women. Harper compares trans women to large cars with engines that are too small.

“The small car with the small engine [a biological woman] can, in many ways, outrun the large car with the small engine,” Harper told Vice.

Yet others believe that trans women athletes have an advantage in sport simply because biological men are predisposed to be taller than women—something no amount of testosterone suppression can reverse. But Harper contends height can be a disadvantage in certain sports like weightlifting and gymnastics, where athletes with a lower center of gravity tend to perform better.

However, in sports like basketball and volleyball, being taller is arguably beneficial. But should height alone prevent trans women from playing in women’s divisions that match their current hormones levels?

[More from Excelle Sports: Transgender wrestler wins regional high school title in Texas]

There is, perhaps, no good answer for that, as there’s still not enough research on trans athletes to properly weigh the advantages and disadvantages in each sport.

While Harper’s study was progressive as one of the first of its kind, her sample size of only eight runners (including herself) wasn’t large enough to be considered conclusive, was specific to running and did not include Olympic-level or internationally competitive athletes.

Ashland Johnson, director of public education and research at the Human Rights Campaign, the country’s largest LGBT advocacy group, says that there needs to be longterm studies on trans athletes conducted through their entire athletic careers. Lacking this kind of research, Johnson says it’s difficult to evaluate the IOC’s policy on trans athletes.

“We [also] don’t know what the normal levels of testosterone should be,” Johnson told Excelle Sports. “We haven’t done any longterm studies on that either. And then what is the correlation between having more testosterone and being better at sports? We know that is not an indicator that you are going to be a better athlete than someone else.”

Higher testosterone levels, for example, don’t explain why softball Olympian Jennie Finch can strike out MLB’s best hitters. Nor do they explain how five-time gold medalist Katie Ledecky beat the men’s qualifying times at the 2016 U.S. Olympic Trials.

There are many other variables around trans athletes that also need to be studied, including genetics, age and ethnicity, Johnson adds.

“I don’t know if I’m walking around with more testosterone than the average white person,” said Johnson, who identifies as African American.

What’s more, critics say the IOC’s trans athlete policy, which depends almost exclusively on hormone levels, sends the wrong message to athletic organizations that discriminate against biological women who may naturally have higher amounts of testosterone in their bodies.

For example, biological female sprinters India’s Dutee Chand and South Africa’s Caster Semenya were both banned from competition because they had natural testosterone levels that exceeded the IOC’s limit for women athletes. Both have a condition called hyperandrogenism, which causes them to naturally produce more testosterone than the average female athlete.

In 2013, Chand refused the IOC’s request to lower her testosterone levels through medical treatment, while Semenya conceded to take medication in order to compete in the 2016 Olympic Games.

While the IOC’s trans policies do not dictate how the committee should treat athletes with hyperandroginism, Chand and Semenya’s cases challenge the policy’s hormone standards for female athletes.

“We’re putting way too much emphasis on testosterone alone,” Helen Carroll, sports project director at the National Center for Lesbian Rights, a non-profit LGBT public interest law firm, told Excelle Sports.

Carroll, who also helped author the NCAA’s trans athlete inclusion regulations, agrees that the IOC’s trans policy is the most inclusive to date, but work still needs to be done.

“To use that one measure [of testosterone] to determine whether women get to play in the women’s or men’s area is already outdated,” she said. “There’s a fallacy in that we are looking to get a level playing field. There really is no such thing. Every person has positives and negatives compared to the competitor standing next to them.”

Based on this premise, some think the simplest way to deal with the complexities of gender in sport is to eradicate male and female divisions altogether in athletics.

[More from Excelle Sports: Laurel Hubbard becomes first transgender woman to win international weightlifting title]

Aidan Key, a trans man and director of Gender Diversity, an education and support group for transgender issues, says that coed sports leagues in soccer, softball, flag football and volleyball have already set the precedent for non-binary competition, or that which isn’t based on gender.

“It could happen that we compete based on skill level,” he told the Seattle Times. “There’s [already] a lot of intramural, coed teams with different levels of athletic competition.

“So we already have it in place—we just don’t recognize that we’re creating these environments. We’re still using gender as a shortcut to accomplishing the kind of environments that we want, which makes an assumption that women aren’t competitive or have a high enough skill level. It’s just not true.”

The Tia Thompson debate

From Tia Thompson’s Facebook page on April 2.

So is it unfair for Thompson to play volleyball with biological women?

Thompson says she has no competitive advantages over other female athletes, pointing to her March performance in the Haili Volleyball Tournament as evidence: Her team finished in fourth place out of eight teams in the women’s division.

“It’s educational in a way to let USA Volleyball know that I’m transgender, I play with a bunch of biological women and I didn’t even win the tournament,” Thompson said. “So what does that tell you? It’s OK.”

Regardless of whether Thompson has an unfair advantage, she’ll still have to prove her talent more than she already has in order to beat hundreds of other volleyball players and earn a coveted spot on the 2020 U.S. women’s national team

“I’m excited because I’m definitely going to try out,” said Thompson. “I would say I have a pretty good shot.”

Jump To Comments
  • Dumpster

    There goes women’s sports.

  • occupylove

    wow. the question here is should men be allowed to play against biological females if said men feel like women and take drugs and have surgeries… and no the answer is not complicated if you are not a sexist misogynist selfish self centered ideologically driven extremist. The answer is NO! Hell NO! Get the hell out of female only spaces and sports – and anything segregated on physical biological reality and facts. Science and physical biological fact has nothing to do with your identity or feelings. Start a trans team. Play with other trans athletes. Live a good life. Really. But STOP destroying female sports, boundaries and violating OUR EQUALLY VALID HUMAN RIGHTS. JUST STOP!

    • jojoMonkey

      “These men”

      Nice transphobia. Trans women are women. Trans women are not men.

      Fuck you if you think otherwise.

  • Ennis Demeter

    These men have no integrity and they are making a mockery of women’s sports. Elite women athletes should never be forced or pressured into competing against mediocre, self hobbled male athletes who totally promise that their hormones put them on a level playing field. It’s disrespectful and unbelievably unfair. Women’s sports don’t exist to validate dysphoric men. Find another way.

    • jojoMonkey

      “These men”

      Again, nice transphobia. Trans women are women. Trans women are not men.

      Fuck you if you think otherwise.

  • kirsti

    Mack Beggs, an 18 year old XX transitioning male wrestler (born as a female transitioning to a male) from Euless Trinity High School near Dallas, defended his Texan State Title in Cypress near Houston winning the girls’ class 6A 110- pound (49kg) division with an undefeated record. He beat Chelsea Sanchez, who he had defeated for the title in 2017, in the final match on Saturday.

    Following Beggs’ win the usual cheers reserved for an undefeated winner were not forth coming. Video posted online within minutes of Beggs winning showed a mix of cheers and boos from the crowd.
    Why the boos for such an outstanding win one might ask. There is no doubt that his transitioning status from female to male and his approved Therapeutic Use Exception (TUE) for low doses of testosterone were the reasons why the same accolades for other winners didn’t follow beggs’ victory.

    When Beggs’ win hit social media the usual transphobic hate was rife with a majority of posters vilifying Beggs for his transgender status with a large percentage identifying him as a biological male transitioning into a female which is the complete opposite to the truth, Mack Beggs was born a biological female.

    There is no other story that incites so much hate as a transgender person participating in sport does with the exception of stories relating to transgender bathroom use or in President Trumps case his hate for transgender people serving in the military. Hannah Mouncey the XY Transitioning Female Australian Rules Football League player has faced months of online transphobia after having her application to be drafted in the elite women’s competition the AFLW rejected. Laurel Hubbard the first XY transitioned female to compete at the Commonwealth Games has also faced intense online transphobia and hate.

    To Beggs’ credit he has responded to the boos and online hate with class. Over the last two years this brave young man has matured into a role model for other transitioning and gender diverse people his story has become global he is inspiring other transitioning people to give sport a go, to be themselves and to never give up.

    Both Beggs and his family have repeatedly said he wants to wrestle with the other boys but Texan State Laws prevent him from
    doing so. Beggs is forced to fight the girls and to use the female bathrooms he has no choice in this matter. The birth certificate rule in Texas was approved in 2016 by the University Interscholastic League, the governing body for Texas high school sports. It was done in order to help schools determine competition, said Jamie Harrison, the UIL’s deputy director.

    The State laws in Texas are in stark contrast to most other transgender Sports policies. Chris Mossier , of TransAthelete.com, told the newspaper because of the vote and its passing, “Texas now becomes one of the most restrictive states in the nation for transgender athletic participation.”

    If Mack Beggs were to compete beyond the school system in Texas ie; the Olympics Games or Commonwealth Games he would have to compete in the men’s division.

    Harrison Brown is another XX transitioning male who plays professional women’s ice hockey. Harrison has not had any testosterone treatment as yet effectively meaning Harrison has
    socially transitioned, Harrison has said publicly that he wishes to finish his hockey career prior to him starting HRT. Harrison isn’t being booed playing ice hockey maybe it’s because has been given testosterone yet or maybe booing its a Texan thing their policies are backward!

    As an XX transitioning male. Beggs still has female androgen receptors ie (ovaries) with XX receptors being 6 to 8 times more sensitive then XY receptors (gonads). Beggs says he is only administered small amounts of exogenous testosterone. Even with small amounts of testosterone. Beggs still has functioning XX androgen receptors (ovaries) which are highly sensitive to testosterone so he is effectively super doping. His physical changes even in the last 12 months has shown Beggs to have masculinised significantly.

    The current IOC participation guidelines were amended in 2015 enabling XX transitioning male to compete unrestricted in the Males competition. We are already seeing XX transitioning males competing equally with and sometimes beating XY Males in particular in endurance events such as Chris Mossier from the USA who is a current member of the USA National Men’s Duathon Team. I predict the next generation of XX transitioning super doped males especially when they start testosterone early in their teens will be super competitive in men’s endurance events.

    Beggs and his HRT regime are a polar opposites to an XY transitioning female and her HRT regime. Where as Beggs and other transitioning males are given extremely powerful performance enhancing drugs those transitioning from male to female are administered extremely powerful performance dehancing medications the same drugs that are used to chemically castrate sex offenders the the same drugs that treat prostate cancer sufferers.

    XY Transitioning females are lowering and eventually stopping permanently their production of testosterone eventually leaving an XY women in complete androgen deprivation.

    The current IOC guidelines are totally not sufficient to minimise the advantage in women’s sport for all XY Transitioning Females. Since 2015 when the IOC amended their policy to include transitioning XY females that had not undergone gender surgery and halved the 2 year period of testosterone reduction to 12 months the balance of fairness was tipped in the favour of the XY Transitioning Female, I suggest.

    This update in policy was not based on science it was a half a day decision made without research to lesson liability in Kristen Worleys HR Case in the Divisional Court in Toronto.

    My suggestions for future policy development for XY transitioning and Transitioned XY Females are.

    1/At the community level of sport self identification as the only perquisite to participation.

    2/At Regional, State, National and International, Sporting events only XY transitioned females (fully transitioned) are able to compete with a minimum of 3 years to have elapsed post surgery. Also a case by case consideration must always be used to ensure the advantage in women’s competition has minimised enough to compete fairly in women completion. I also suggest that pre participation tests must be carried out such as base line V02 Oxygen Levels and muscle mass and bone density.

    3/ In high impact sports like the AFL at any level. I suggest the same criteria apply as per the requirements for international competition.

    I am only one person who has lived and breathed these changes and I am not saying I am the expert on this subject,’if there is actually an expert in all of this.

    At this point, it is important to point out that testosterone is not exclusively a male hormone. It is produced by both males and females in the testicles and ovaries (and also in the adrenal glands), however males need to produce it in higher quantities as they have XY androgen receptors. XX androgen receptors are highly sensitive to testosterone, requiring much less testosterone to equate the same level of health. However, both male and female elite athletes also produce testosterone in higher quantities than the ‘normal’ population, and there is also a significant amount of overlap between testosterone levels in male and female elite athletes.The maintenance of endogenous testosterone levels is essential to basic health in both men and women. An XY male who transitions to XY female has had their major source of endogenous testosterone (the testicles) taken away, so needs to take synthetic testosterone in order to maintain basic health.

    XY women (fully transitioned) are the only athletes competing unhealthy in a complete androgen deprivation state and well beyond a (post menopause state). Incredibly unhealthy and spore eventually becomes impossible as the body deteriorates as it cannot respond to day-to-day functions without androgens as the bodies primary communications and regulator hormone.

    Moreover and important, the XY transitioned female is the only body that can show the health and key markers where the body turns on then off, as the body loses its ability to regulate androgens.

    Which then causes complete androgen deprivation of the human body, heavily contraindicates it as testosterone plays over 200 functions in the body every single day separate of the sex of the physiology.

    Sent from my iPhone

  • Gaz Fragz

    I’d like to put forward my theory that up is down & down is in fact up.

  • 7otherpages

    I’m in favour of letting trans people increasingly dominate women’s sport for a few years, just to piss off the feminists.

  • kirsti

    I am just one person these are my thoughts on where we are up to in this discussion. I strongly suggest we need round the table discussions with individual sports and we need a multi skilled group of people to arrive at the best way to move forward in these discussions. We need to listen to the concerns of all stakeholders and err on the side of caution

    Sports need to embrace and promote diversity, inclusion and accessibility in all things they do. Sport needs to also have a start point of everyone is able to play unless an unnatural advantage exists. I would like as many sports as possible to become non gender specific and I suggest sports should separate their sports in a similar way in which the International Paralympics Committee separates their sports, on abilities not gender.

    Presently sports are predominantly segregated by biological sex and I see that remaining for most sports for the immediate future.

    For both XY female and XX male transitioning and transitioned athletes there are many sports that could have no prerequisite to compete in the competition that matches the athletes gender identity particularly in sports that do not require strength and endurance.

    I suggest some sports could have varying criteria to be met at each level of their sport in a similar way Australian Cycling has developed their transgender guidelines with self identification the only requirement at the local level with more stringent criteria to be met up to the elite level of their sport.

    Their is no doubt that being born with an XY male endocrine system, experiencing a male puberty and living many years with the normal range of male testosterone levels on average gives an XY person an advantage in endurance and strength then an XX female. The clearest example of this advantage can be observed with every world sporting record that relates to strength and endurance is held by an XY male and the difference between XX female and XY male world records is about 10 to 12%.

    As XY transitioning and transitioned female athletes if we can show we have minimised our advantage as an individual by 10 to 12% as a minimum during our transition I am confident we would gain far more acceptance in sport.

    I strongly suggest that any sport that is currently following the IOC & WADA Guidelines immediately retract this policy as these guidelines were not based on science they were developed in half a day as a hip response to lesson liability in Kristen Worley’s HR case in the divisional court in Toronto Canada. The current guidelines force transitioning and transitioned XY females to maintain extremely unhealthy testosterone levels which results in XY females entering into a permanent state of severe post menopausal symptoms and complete androgen deprivation.
    Over 200 functions in my body everyday have been adversely affected by maintaining my endogenous testosterone level under 10 nmols.
    The current IOC & WADA guidelines also permits XX transitioning males to super dope unrestricted with exogenous testosterone once again resulting in a very unhealthy athlete.

    I agree that gender surgery is not a prerequisite to compete in any sport at any level for both XY females and XX males.

    I agree that self declaration is sufficient to notify a sport of your gender. (To many countries have varying laws relating to change of gender with many countries not allowing legal gender changes) sport has no place in determining someone’s sex.

    I believe their should be no restriction placed on endogenous testosterone levels.

    Clearer criteria needs to be developed firstly to enable both the trans athlete and their opponents to have a full understanding of how, when and how the criteria is met or not met and what the criteria is. We have to stop having the athlete at the time of competition having to defend their participation like Laurel Hubbard recently endured. Secondly we need this criteria to be able to show that each XY female has minimised their advantage by 10 to 12%.

    I suggest at the elite level of sports and in high impact sports like Rugby League and Australian Rules Football are treated on a case by case basis to ensure the advantage in women’s competition has been minimised. How we do this I suggest is by having as previously stated clearer criteria to be met such as pre transition BMI, V02 Levels, muscle mass and bone density as well as testosterone levels etc.

    Some athletes could meet this criteria very quickly others like myself may take years longer with many variables affecting the feminisation process such as the age at time of transition the previous sports involvement etc. a blanket time frame I do not suggest could ever work as we all transition at such different rates.

    I am happy to clarify or expand on any of this written communication is very one dimensional at times.

  • kirsti

    My name is Kirsti Miller formerly Warren Miller I send you this email as I have grave concerns with the current transgender sports participation guidelines in particular with the guidelines in high impact sports such as AFL Football.

    I am a former duel international male athlete having represented Australia at many world championships and Pan American Games in the sports of Modern Pentathlon and Aquathon. I am also a former first grade rugby league player with Wagga Brothers, I was an inaugural inductee in the Wagga Wagga Sporting Hall Of Fame I was the only inductee inducted for multiple sports being swimming, Modern Pentathlon and Aquathon. I was inducted alongside other Australian Sports Legends such as Mortimer, Sterling, Arthur Summons, Wayne Carey, Paul Kelly, Mark Taylor and Michael Slater.

    In 2013 I became the first fully transitioned woman to play women’s AFL Football at any level in Australia out here in Broken Hill. I commenced my transition back in the year 2000 at the time I was the local Governor of the Broken Hill Correctional Centre. I underwent gender surgery in 2006 also having my birth certificate amended to female in 2006.

    There has been a lot of controversy with transgender participation in sports in recent times in particular with the stories of Laurel Hubbard the Nz transitioned weightlifter and also Hannah Mouncey the former male international handball player and women’s Aussie Rules Football Player.

    There has also been much misinformed information reported in recent times from both the media and also by Hannah Mouncey herself, these people are deers in the headlights in this conversation.

    I am a long time transgender sports advocate and educator in diversity and inclusion in sports. I am heavily involved in global discussions and also discussions within Australia re developing an updated trans sports participation guidelines.

    Not many people are aware that the new IOC Guidelines that were released prior to the Rio Olympics were developed in 1/2 a day by 90 sports officials without science. These policies were developed as a hip response to lesson liability in the divisional court in Toronto Canada in the human rights case of Canadian Transitioned Female Cyclist Kristen Worley’s historic human rights victory.

    The current IOC policy removed the the requirement of trans females having to have had gender surgery as a prerequisite to compete and they also introduced a policy of trans women having to have a level of endogenous testosterone Of below 10nmols per litre of blood at least 12 months prior to there first competition in the female category.
    The advantage with this new policy has without doubt tipped the advantage in the favour of transgender athletes and in high impact sports it has cause a definite health and safety risk to biologically born females.

    What concerns me is that our competitors are being harshly criticised for objecting to this new policy or even for having their concerns voiced political correctness is rife in this conversation unfortunately.

    There are many factors other then increased testosterone levels that significantly affect the competitive edge in sport such as nutrition,age,height, weight,access to coaching and training facilities, & other genetic and biological variations like oxygen-carrying capacity.

    For a person transitioning from XY male to XY female we need to be able to show how we have minimised our strength & endurance by 10 to 12% the estimated performance difference between males and females across most sports that rely on endurance & strength. Up until puberty age there is very little performance difference between the sexes experiencing a male puberty is where the difference in males & females in endurance and strength becomes evident, @Scienceofsport explains this better then anyone I have heard before. To enable XY females to gain some credibility in sports we need to identify measurable quantities that can show all stakeholders how we have minimised this advantage of experiencing a male puberty and living years with a male endocrine system.

    Some of the measurable quantities I suggest could be screening pre transition V02 Oxygen levels, muscle mass , testosterone levels, bone density and BMI’s. We need the criteria to compete to be clear for both the transitioning athlete & our competitors. This hopefully would minimise transitioning athletes having to defend the right to compete each time they play sport & it would show our competition in measurable terms what the criteria is to compete, and when and how the criteria has been met. Our competition also face criticism unfairly when they question the rights of transitioning athletes competing this would be minimised with clearer and measurable quantities within trans participation policies.

    For XX female to XX male athletes minimising performance is not seen necessary although I do have concerns this may be the case in the future with XX males being able to super dope unrestricted. XX females transitioning to XX males do not have to undergo a hysterectomy (removal of the womb and ovaries), but a gonadectomy (removal of testicles) is carried out on XY males transitioning to XY females.

    What this means, in effect, is that XX males do not have the main testosterone-producing organ in their body removed, but XY females do. Sport has put forward the idea that transitioning from one sex to the other is the same process. The XY female’s body is broken down into a post-menopausal state and the complications that come with that. The XX male gets juiced, and goes into a hyper state due to their known biological sensitivity to androgens. You see them in football, in bodybuilding, in all the big muscle sports doing exceptionally well, because they are taking these high levels of testosterone that are completely unregulated. They never bring XX males back into a state of lower values after they have gone through transition. They just stick to those higher levels. Chris Mossier could not be competing the way that he competes as a biathlete without those really high levels of testosterone. Mack Beggs is a hyper-doping athlete competing in sport who is outperforming other female athletes. People should be complaining because it’s clearly doping. Chris Mossier , Beggs and others have been getting away with it and this is the problem with what the IOC has done. It has solely focused on the male/female social model, but has never done the necessary homework. The science actually opposes the IOC’s international policy.

    With XY females fully transitioned I believe creating a fair inclusionpolicy could be achieved now, XY women (fully transitioned) are the only athletes competing unhealthy in a complete androgen deprivation state and well beyond a (post menopause state). Incredibly unhealthy and spore eventually becomes impossible as the body deteriorates as it cannot respond to day-to-day functions without androgens as the bodies primary communications and regulator hormone. Moreover and important, the XY transitioned female is the only body that can show the health and key markers where the body turns on then off, as the body loses its ability to regulate androgens.
    Which then causes complete androgen deprivation of the human body, heavily contraindicates it as testosterone plays over 200 functions in the body every single day separate of the sex of the physiology.

    A transitioning XY Female (pre op)are hypgonatic, not feeling full effects of complete androgen deprivation and plus 2 dozen contraindications because they still have gonads. If they were a HP athlete prior and during continued transition minimising the advantage in women’s competition takes even longer years longer. A pre op XY female still has a male endocrine system all it takes is for the transitioning athlete is to not take their androgens blockers for a day and testosterone production will recommence.

    A transitioning (pre op) XY Female effectively has the equivalent of a fully loaded syringe of testosterone at her disposal. As Hannah Mouncey states in a recent article she only had to provide her initial testosterone levels with no follow up tests very easy to manipulate testosterone levels. At the elite level of sport & also in high impact sports this is a grave concern. A transitioning XY female athlete could take just enough testosterone blockers to maintain a testosterone level at just under 10nmols very easily with manipulating her medication, almost impossible to police.

    The truth in this conversation needs to hit mainstream media the integrity of women’s sport is to important for it not to be.

  • David Gekko

    The current world record for the one mile run (male) is 3:43 seconds is held by Hicham El Guerrouj of Morocco. The current women’s world record holder for the one mile run is Svetlana Masterkova of Russia, at 4:12

    That is a difference of 30 seconds, half a minute. Not 3 seconds, 30 seconds

    Why is that?

  • kirsti

    I am just one person these are my thoughts on where we are up to in this discussion. I strongly suggest we need round the table discussions with individual sports
    and we need a multi skilled group of people to arrive at the best way to move forward in these discussions. We need to listen to the concerns of all stakeholders and err on the side of caution

    Sports need to embrace and promote diversity, inclusion and accessibility in all things they do. Sport needs to also have a start point of everyone is able to play unless an unnatural advantage exists.

    I would like as many sports as possible to become non gender specific and I suggest sports should separate their sports in a similar way in which the International Paralympics Committee separates their sports, on abilities not gender.Presently sports are predominantly segregated by biological sex and I see that remaining for most sports for the immediate future.

    For both XY female and XX male transitioning and transitioned athletes there are many sports that could have no prerequisite to compete in the competition that matches the athletes gender identity particularly in sports that do not require strength and endurance.

    I suggest some sports could have varying criteria to be met at each level of their sport in a similar way Australian Cycling has developed their transgender guidelines with self identification the only
    requirement at the local level with more stringent criteria to be met up to the elite level of their sport.

    Their is no doubt that being born with an XY male endocrine system, experiencing a male puberty and living many years with the normal range of male testosterone levels on average gives an XY person an advantage in endurance and
    strength then an XX female. The clearest example of this advantage can be observed with every world sporting record that relates to strength and endurance is held by an XY male and the difference between XX female and XY male world records is about 10 to 12%.

    As XY transitioning and transitioned female athletes if we can show we have minimised our advantage as an individual by 10 to 12% as a minimum during our transition I am confident we would gain far more acceptance in sport.

    I strongly suggest that any sport that is currently following the IOC & WADA Guidelines immediately retract this policy as these guidelines were not based on science they were developed in half a day as a hip response to lesson liability in Kristen Worley’s HR case in the divisional court in Toronto Canada. The current guidelines force transitioning and transitioned XY females to maintain extremely unhealthy testosterone levels which results in XY females entering into a permanent state of severe post menopausal symptoms and complete androgen deprivation. Over 200 functions in my body everyday have been adversely affected by maintaining my endogenous testosterone level under 10 nmols.

    The current IOC & WADA guidelines also permits XX transitioning males to super dope unrestricted with exogenous testosterone once again resulting in a very unhealthy athlete.

    Clearer criteria needs to be developed firstly to enable both the trans athlete and their opponents to have a full understanding of how, when and how the criteria is met or not met and what the criteria is.

    We have to stop having the athlete at the time of competition having to defend their participation like Laurel Hubbard recently endured. Secondly we need this criteria to be able to show that each XY female has minimised their advantage by 10 to 12%.

    I suggest at the elite level of sports and in high impact sports like Rugby League and Australian Rules Football are treated on a case by case basis to ensure the advantage in women’s competition has been minimised.

    How we do this I suggest is by having as previously stated clearer criteria to be met such as pre transition BMI, V02 Levels, muscle mass and bone density as well as testosterone levels etc.

    Some athletes could meet this criteria very quickly others like myself may take years longer with many variables affecting the feminisation process such as the age at time of transition the
    previous sports involvement etc. a blanket time frame I do not suggest could ever work as we all transition at such different rates.

    This is a radio interview I did with this is a radio interview I did with Gerard Healy where I discussed the original Hannah Mouncey draft decision.

    https://omny.fm/shows/sportsday/transgender-athlete-kirsty-miller